From 1f6f364a56319eabd02c050746fe7df3f55ffee3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?R=C3=A9mi=20Verschelde?= Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 17:01:17 +0200 Subject: Port member initialization from constructor to declaration (C++11) Using `clang-tidy`'s `modernize-use-default-member-init` check and manual review of the changes, and some extra manual changes that `clang-tidy` failed to do. Also went manually through all of `core` to find occurrences that `clang-tidy` couldn't handle, especially all initializations done in a constructor without using initializer lists. --- core/string_name.cpp | 6 ------ 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-) (limited to 'core/string_name.cpp') diff --git a/core/string_name.cpp b/core/string_name.cpp index 9cbac97a7c..bfc10d96e4 100644 --- a/core/string_name.cpp +++ b/core/string_name.cpp @@ -388,12 +388,6 @@ StringName StringName::search(const String &p_name) { return StringName(); //does not exist } -StringName::StringName() { - - _data = nullptr; -} - StringName::~StringName() { - unref(); } -- cgit v1.2.3